Backed byY Combinator

More tokens.Same hardware. Same quality.

Autonomous performance optimization across the stack. From serving engine to assembly, preserving your model’s quality.

  • Your modelOriginal quality preserved
  • Your workloadOptimized for real traffic
  • The whole stackServing engine to assembly
  • More throughputFrom the same hardware

Self-optimizing inference endpoints

Dedicated capacity.
A fixed rate. More room to run.

Our self-serve endpoints put that optimization to work: dedicated hardware for your model, continuously tuned to your traffic.

Rent dedicated hardware.

Choose an endpoint for your model. Get dedicated hardware, your own URL and a key. The capacity is yours to use.

No token limits.

Send parallel work without a token quota. Run as many agents as your hardware can serve; dedicated capacity sets the pace.

Pay by capacity.

A fixed rate for the hardware you choose, for the time you use it. No per-token charges. Billing increments are shown before launch.

Keep improving.

We optimize for your traffic in the background, testing ways to get more throughput from the capacity you already rent.

The best endpoint for agent swarms.

Dedicated hardware. No token quota. A fixed capacity rate as your agents get more done.

Explore swarm tools

How we optimize

Autonomous
performance optimization.

We give optimization agents a model, a workload and a target machine. They explore changes across the serving stack, test them on the hardware, and build on the improvements that pass a fixed acceptance contract.

01 / DEFINE THE PROBLEM

Your model. Your traffic.

The original model is the reference. We characterize your workload: request sizes, concurrency and reusable context. That workload and the target hardware define the optimization problem.

02 / EXPLORE IMPLEMENTATIONS

Agents do the iteration.

Agents propose changes, profile bottlenecks and run experiments. They can search serving policies, model execution and low-level code within the scope allowed by the runtime.

03 / KEEP THE IMPROVEMENT

Every result faces the same rules.

Candidate and baseline run under the same conditions. Repeated comparisons and held-out workloads decide which changes qualify. The measured result and its configuration are retained for the next iteration.

Where the speed comes from

Performance lives
across the stack.

We optimize the path from your original model to the instructions running on your devices. Serving decisions, model execution, placement and kernels affect one another. Our agents search across those boundaries with the target hardware in mind.

Fixed referenceYour original model + your workloadSoftware changes are tested against this contract.

Model execution / We optimize

Preserve the model. Improve its implementation.

The original model defines the computation. We explore how that computation is carried out: operator fusion, reusable work and model-specific algorithms, under the model's fixed behavior contract.

What we optimize
Computation graphs, operator combinations and reusable intermediate work.
What stays fixed
The original model remains the reference for every candidate.

Serving engine / We optimize

Make the engine fit the traffic.

Request scheduling, batching and cache management determine how much useful work the GPUs receive. We optimize these decisions together for your workload and target hardware.

What we optimize
Batch formation, request scheduling, KV-cache reuse and serving policies.
What stays fixed
The same model and service-level constraints govern each comparison.

Device placement / We optimize

Put work where it runs best.

How a model is divided across devices affects memory use, communication and throughput. We explore partitioning, replication and data movement for the available devices and their interconnect.

What we optimize
Tensor, pipeline and data parallelism; placement of computation and state.
What stays fixed
The target hardware and the permitted deployment scope stay explicit.

Kernel design / We optimize

Build the operations the model needs.

We optimize the work inside GPU kernels: fuse operations, choose tiles and layouts, reuse data and reduce unnecessary memory traffic. Each change is evaluated as part of the full serving workload.

What we optimize
Operator implementations, tiling, fusion and memory-access patterns.
What stays fixed
A faster isolated kernel must still improve the end-to-end workload.

Compiler & assembly / We optimize

Carry the optimization down to instructions.

Code generation, instruction selection and scheduling connect the model's operations to the device. We specialize these choices for the target instruction set, register budget and execution resources.

What we optimize
Compiler transformations, generated assembly and instruction scheduling.
What stays fixed
Changes remain subject to the same model-behavior and performance contract.

ISA & microarchitecture / Hardware target

Optimize for the machine that will run it.

The instruction set, compute units, memory hierarchy and interconnect constrain what is fast. We use those constraints to guide software changes and measure the result on the target hardware.

How it guides the search
Hardware-aware software choices, from serving policies down to assembly.
The boundary
The existing hardware is the target of optimization; chip design is outside this scope.

A decade at the hardware‑software boundary.

Backed by Y Combinator.

  • Kaden Cassidy

    Kaden Cassidy

    Top 20 in the Anthropic kernel optimization challenge. 600+ certification tests shipping in RISC-V International's ACT4 suite.

  • Parth Kocheta

    Parth Kocheta

    Sped up petabyte-scale robotics infrastructure at Amazon. Visual-inertial odometry for autonomous drones at CMU's AirLab.

Bring one workload. See what it can do.